Tuesday, December 11, 2012

Fwd: Shocking: How the Mass. 'transgender rights' law is changing the schools

December 11, 2012
MassResistance Update
Pro-family activism

"In a time of universal deceit telling the truth is a revolutionary act."
- George Orwell

1. Massachusetts schools implementing "transgender non-discrimination" policies -- fueled by 2011 law!  More horrors on the way.

2. How the radical "transgender rights" law finally passed in Massachusetts (on its 3rd try). Flawed pro-family strategy led to fatal "compromise."

3. Help us reach our goal!

(Part 1 of 2. Part 2 will be in our next email.)

1. Massachusetts schools implementing "transgender non-discrimination" policies -- fueled by 2011 law!  More horrors on the way.

Along with "gay marriage," the big push by the homosexual lobby in states across the country is focused on children and the public schools.

This is what the transgender movement is about. A huge man in a dress marches with girls who want to be boys at a state-sponsored "Youth Pride" event in Boston in 2007. This man showed up everywhere that day. [MassResistance photo]


In late September, we got a phone call from a parent in West Springfield, Massachusetts. The school committee there had quietly decided to add to the non-discrimination policy in their school system: It was now to include "gender identity and expression." The final vote would be at the next meeting, in two weeks.

Thus, the school system was about to declare it official policy that boys coming to school in dresses and calling themselves girls now constituted a "protected class" that must be accommodated. Girls who "identified" as boys must be allowed to use the boys' facilities, etc.

The "transgender" activists in Massachusetts even have their own logo! Their big push now in the public schools.

It's madness! The implications of this policy in a school setting are nothing short of institutionalized lunacy.

After making a few calls, we found out that the School Committee Chairman (a Republican, who is also the Mayor) was not comfortable with passing this. But all the other School Committee members (all liberal Democrats) were strongly insisting it be done. They were not interested in discussing it on the merits; they just wanted it passed. A few of them said that the state's association of school committees (also a very liberal group) was partially behind it. Clearly, some activists somewhere were pushing this. And when the city attorney looked into it, he agreed that "it's the law" now and apparently needed to be added to the school's policy.

So at the next meeting, on Oct. 9, the School Committee (including the Chairman) unanimously passed it. It seemed to have been done unusually fast.

A parent who attended that meeting told MassResistance that he was outraged and tried to discuss it with the Committee members (a few of whom he knows fairly well), but none of them would talk to him about it -- except to say that it had to be done. The fact that the medical profession considers this behavior a "disorder"  which can cause considerable harm meant nothing to them.

Photo taken by parent as West Springfield School Committee votes to accept "gender identity" as a protected class.


The newly passed "transgender law" at work . . .

The culprit is the newly passed Massachusetts "transgender rights" law, which we had warned people about since 2007. Although it does not specifically require schools to have a written "policy" about transgenderism, it does prohibit all schools in Massachusetts from "discriminating" regarding transgenderism.

M.G.L. Chapter 76: Section 5.
. . . No person shall be excluded from or discriminated against in admission to a public school of any town, or in obtaining the advantages, privileges and courses of study of such public school on account of race, color, sex, gender identity, religion, national origin or sexual orientation.

The holy grail of the transgender lobby

Having a law that bans any discrimination in public schools for cross-dressing or other "transgender" behaviors has for years been the holy grail of the transgender lobby and a major goal of the allied homosexual movement. They have been obsessed with forcing this aspect of their agenda on children, and are very well organized politically (Note that the Mass. School Psychologists Association is in their alliance.)

Teenage boy at public school affiliated "Youth Pride" prom run by homosexual and transgender activists in Boston in 2005.


This non-discrimination requirement allows them to freely push that agenda in all grades, including: transgender-themed books, classroom assignments, assemblies, and diversity training. It will allow and support the most outlandish dress and behavior by very troubled children. It will promote the concepts of hormone injection and even body mutilation in the minds of young children. Boys will play on girls' sports teams and use their school locker rooms (and vice versa). And boys will come to school in dresses and use girls' restrooms. Of course, there will also be the transgender adults -- including teachers, counselors, and other staff.

Schools will be seeing a lot more of these!  Poster in Acton-Boxborough High School in Acton, Mass. in 2007.  [MassResistance photo]

We must continue fighting it. But this insane movement's momentum is getting stronger both here and across the country.

And around the country: School Board of Orange County, Florida to vote this week

Although it may have started in Massachusetts, look for this to be a pattern across the country.

As this was going to press, an activist in Florida contacted us to tell us that the School Board of Orange County, Florida will be voting on a similar measure on Tuesday evening, Dec. 11. In this case, it's not required by law, but is being pushed by the local homosexual lobby, claiming that "it's the right thing to do… to attract the best and brightest teachers and staff to our school district."

2. How the radical "transgender rights" law finally passed in Massachusetts (on its 3rd try). Flawed pro-family strategy led to fatal "compromise".

The "transgender rights" law got passed in Mass. (in Nov. 2011) as a combination of an incredible push by the homosexual lobby and the state's top politicians, plus a terrible strategy by the moderate (but well-funded) pro-family forces.

On its face, the concept of mainstreaming, legalizing, and ultimately forcing under threat of law the concept of transgenderism on the public, businesses, institutions, and government would appear to be nearly impossible.

To the average person, for instance, a man who is so psychologically disturbed that he believes he is really a woman, and has his male body parts surgically removed (with other mutiliations) and has female breasts added, is a frightening and tragic individual. And the fact that the mental health profession considers it a "disorder" makes this all the more unbelievable.

Passed on third attempt

When the homosexual lobby first introduced the "transgender rights and hate crimes" bill in 2007, it was considered so bizarre that it did not get out of committee. But the activists were persistent. The following session, in 2009, it was re-introduced and despite dozens of co-sponsors, it met the same fate. It wasn't until the third time, in 2011, that they were able to pass it -- and even then it took extraordinary measures and force by the political leadership.

MassResistance at the forefront of educating about the bill

It was being touted as "civil rights" legislation. But from the beginning MassResistance was at the forefront of confronting the bill and educating both the public and members of the Legislature about its radical nature. It was much more far-reaching than just a "bathroom bill."

Here's just a sample of what MassResistance did to fight back and educate the public:

Produced a comprehensive 125-page report on the bill (written by Amy Contrada in 2007 and updated in 2009). Including: how each section of the bill would affect society; the transgender movement in Massachusetts; the transgender movement across the country; and medical information on transgenderism. The report was presented to members of the Legislature at the public hearings.

Bizarre testimony at State House in 2007.  MassResistance documented and testified the bizarre public hearing at the State House in 2007.

Transgender activists testifying at 2007 public hearing.
All three of these people are women! [MassResistance photo.]

Sickening photos of 2008 Northampton Mass. Transgender parade. "Transgender pride on parade: Public celebration by very disturbed people. This is where the transgender movement is going. Caution: Horrible display of body mutilations." (Includes video.)

Transgender lobby's testimony at State House in 2009. Cross-dressers, transgender activists flood hall to sway committee. The political propaganda machine blitzes the State House.

Pro-family Testimony at State House in 2009. Powerful pro-family testimony debunks transgender bill. Video of MassResistance telling the committee the truth.

Transgender Lobby Day at Mass. State House in 2010. Chairman of Judiciary Committee calls opponents of transgender bill "ignorant"
Says "Get over it" if transgenderism makes you uncomfortable!

Restaurant threatened by transgender activists. Another glimpse of what's coming. Transgender activists threaten Peabody restaurant with loss of license, legal sanctions, for turning away men in dresses.

These men threatened a Peabody, Mass. restaurant when
the management felt they were frightening the customers.

Transgender clinic for children! Is this our future? Boston Children's Hospital doctor operates clinic to change gender of prepubescent children (featured in Boston Globe) and testified at hearing for transgender bill.

MassResistance submits chilling testimony from former transgender.  "This surgery is absolutely destructive" -- sad message from former transgender to warn others.

Transgender Bill Flyer. Distributed across Massachusetts to let people know the truth about the bill.

Elementary school introduces cross-dressing and transgenderism in the 3rd grade!! From 2006 -- the year before the bill was filed. A mother confronts the radical edge of the homosexual agenda in the schools -- is forced to remove her daughter from school.

Transsexual janitor in MA elementary school. From 2009. School sends letter to inform parents that male employee is now a "woman."  Says it will tell children in "simple, straightforward" manner.

Radical, onerous, and comprehensive

The three versions of the bill which were re-introduced in successive sessions were basically the same text. They were onerous in forcing the transgender agenda throughout all phases of society -- employment, schools, government, public accommodations, etc. -- with heavy punishments for those who disobeyed.

In addition, the absurd definition of "gender identity" was a further source of fright:

The term "gender identity or expression" shall mean a gender-related identity, appearance, expression, or behavior of an individual, regardless of the individual's assigned sex at birth.

In the final version, it got even stranger. (They're making it up as they go along!)

"Gender identity" shall mean a person's gender-related identity, appearance or behavior, whether or not that gender-related identity, appearance or behavior is different from that traditionally associated with the person's physiology or assigned sex at birth. Gender-related identity may be shown by providing evidence including, but not limited to, medical history, care or treatment of the gender-related identity, consistent and uniform assertion of the gender-related identity or any other evidence that the gender-related identity is sincerely held, as part of a person's core identity; provided however, gender-related identity shall not be asserted for any improper purpose.

Here is our analysis of the 2009 version of the "transgender rights" bill. The enormity of it, when described, was enough to scare away both politicians and the public.

Flawed "bathroom bill" strategy by moderate pro-family groups

Sometime during the second attempt, in 2009-2010 session, a group of well-funded "moderate" pro-family groups decided to use the term "bathroom bill" to describe the transgender bill. They raised money to create a public campaign against the bill, including videos, radio commercials, and more.

The "bathroom bill" strategy had been used successfully in other places. It is a catchy and emotional slogan. But with this unusually comprehensive bill it only described one small part of the threat, and in the end it backfired.

The pro-family group's videos and commercials basically put forth the scenario that the bill would allow a male sexual predator to enter women's restrooms, and threaten young girls in particular. But that message was very misleading and the homosexual lobby (rightfully) complained about it.

Actually, the "bathroom" problem was not about sexual predators, but grown men in women's' clothes simply using women's' restrooms or locker rooms, but producing a very terrifying (though not necessarily dangerous) situation for all women.

To emphasize: The "bathroom" element was just a small part of the terrible effects of this bill. By concentrating only on that, the strategy ignored even worse aspects regarding schools, businesses, and government -- such as allowing a man in a dress to be a school teacher (which has already happened a number of times in Mass.) and punishing parents who complain.

Equally troubling, this tactic also allowed the pro-family moderates to completely avoid criticizing the transgender movement and its perverse behaviors. Thus they escaped being called "hateful," etc., by the mainstream media. It effectively conceded the argument that this was a perversion society needed protection from.

Nevertheless, the "bathroom bill" approach was initially very effective, until the homosexual-transgender lobby figured out how to beat it. The term itself had a nasty connotation that riled the public and that politicians wanted to stay away from.

Huge push by liberal political establishment

After losing the fight in 2007 and 2009 (when the bill never got out of committee), the homosexual lobby declared in 2011 that its passage was its number-one priority. It raised a lot of money, and after months of intense lobbying, they got the Governor, the Senate President, and the Speaker of the House to enthusiastically support the bill.

That was the first step. But the next step was to beat the "bathroom bill" stigma among the rank-and-file House and Senate members.

Transgender activist lobbying in the Massachusetts State House for the Transgender Rights and Hate Crimes bill.  [MassResistance photo]


The compromise that beat the "bathroom bill" stigma

By in late 2011, when the homosexual lobby had gotten their political ducks in order, they implemented a shrewd strategy to beat the "bathroom bill" label. They simply removed the "public accommodations" language from the bill -- and kept everything else intact. Thus, they could now say that public restrooms or locker rooms weren't affected by it, and that there was no longer a "public bathroom" issue. (Of course, restrooms in schools and within businesses, etc., were still covered, but nobody was mentioning that.)

With the "bathroom bill" argument effectively disarmed, most of the Democrat majority in the legislature quickly fell in line. Since the "bathroom bill" focus had been so strong, none of the legislators were prepared to argue its real radical problems.

Just to be sure, the House leadership pushed it through as fast as possible, with almost no debate allowed, and the Senate simply did a quick "voice vote" (so no one's vote would be recorded), and it was done. (See our report HERE.) After five years of trying, the homosexual-transgender lobby had triumphed. The Governor was only too pleased to sign it.

Here's the Roll Call vote in the House (The Senate was done by a cowardly voice vote.)

What they passed: Law includes almost everything they wanted.

The bill that they passed is still very comprehensive. It includes "hate crime" punishments, Mass. Commission Against Discrimination investigations and tribunals, all public schools, businesses, non-profits, labor unions, government, and also commercial transactions and advertisements, hiring, firing, compensation, privileges, advertisements for employment, and more. In fact, there's already a lot of overlap with the public accommodations language they'll be seeking.

You can read our line-by-line analysis of the new law HERE.

Big push in 2013 for the "public accommodations" part.

And the homosexual lobby immediately began to make plans to get the "public accommodations" part passed separately. They've got their emotional stories and their "statistics" and "surveys" all ready for another round with the Legislature in 2013. Will the "bathroom bill" strategy work against this? We don't think so.

Coming up in our NEXT email: Part II. After the bill was passed -- a lever to force the transgender agenda directly into the school system! And the big celebration at the State House in January 2012.

3. Help us reach our goal!

MassResistance has set a goal to reach $100,000 by the end of 2012.

That funding is really needed for our current operations.

          As of: Dec. 10     GOAL: $100,000   Raised: $17,535   Donations: 143

If you haven't donated recently, PLEASE consider it. Whatever amount you can spare will be a great investment in activism and doing good things! Be a part of the resistance!

Besides informing you on the cutting edge culture war issues of the day, we're here to help people around the country (and around the world) confront the forces against us. We've worked with folks from Hawaii to Maine, and from Australia to England. And we want to continue!


Please consider investing in our important work.

Or please consider a monthly donation of $10, $25, $50, $100, or more. Call our office at 781-890-6001 or email us back to get set up. Become a sustainer!

Donations can also be mailed to: MassResistance, PO Box 1612, Waltham, MA 02454
ALL donations are confidential. MassResistance does not sell or lend any of its lists.

The homosexual movement "hates" us because we're not afraid to expose the truth and help you fight back. 

But we need the financial support of people like you to continue our work. Please consider making a generous donation. If MassResistance isn't here to stand up, who else will do it?



Homosexual activists don't like
Brian Camenker of MassResistance


No comments:

Post a Comment