Sunday, June 17, 2012

New video on banning heterosexual therapy

Three steps --

1)     Watch the new video at:

2)     Sign the petition at:

3)     Read PFOX’s letter:

VIA FAX 916-319-3306

June 12, 2012

Assemblywoman Mary Hayashi

Chair, Business Professions and Consumer Protection Committee

State Capital

Sacramento, California

Dear Ms. Hayashi,

We are Parents and Friends of Ex-Gays & Gays (PFOX), a national non-profit organization helping families with homosexual loved ones and supporting an inclusive environment for the ex-gay community. PFOX conducts public education and outreach to further individual self-determination and respect for all Americans, regardless of their sexual orientation.

We write on behalf of our California members in opposition to SB1172, and ask that you vote against this legislation, which would ban therapy for minors with unwanted same-sex attractions. This bill is opposed by therapy organizations and prevents counseling to children who have been sexually molested and therefore confused about their sexual orientation. Teens in stress need more mental health assistance, not less.

As originally drafted, the bill also tried to outlaw such therapy for adults. Equality California, a major sponsor of the bill, opposes ex-gay equality and civil rights for the ex-gay community. They also assert that children should be able to legally change their gender but not their sexual orientation. Evidently, this discriminatory bill seeks to censor sexual minorities and punish the ex-gay community for being who they are.

The American Psychological Association stated in 2009 that affirmative approaches [homosexual affirming therapy] have not been evaluated for safety and efficacy. See Appropriate Therapeutic Responses to Sexual Orientation (APA 2009), page 91 at Yet no similar ban on gay-affirming therapy or therapy to change one’s gender was offered by the bill’s sponsors.

Phobia of former homosexuals is not the answer. Children in need of medical assistance should not be held hostage to political ideology by a powerful lobby. Please do the right thing by our children’s mental health and vote against SB1172.


Regina Griggs

Executive Director


cc: Committee Members


New Video - The Dangers of SB1172


Pacific Justice Institute

Thursday, June 14, 2012




Dear Friends of Freedom,   


Please take a moment to watch and then share this short 30-second video about the dangers of California Senate Bill 1172. 


Getting Help - The Dangers of SB1172

Getting Help - The Dangers of SB1172


Fighting for Freedom,

The Pacific Justice Institute


Like us on FacebookFollow us on TwitterView our videos on YouTube 


Show you support Christian Counseling now by 

texting " PJI " to 20222 to donate $10 

to Promote Justice, Protect Family, and Preserve Faith!



Pacific Justice Institute is a non-profit 501(c)(3) legal defense organization specializing in the defense of religious freedom, parental rights, and other civil liberties.  Pacific Justice Institute works diligently, without charge, to provide their clients with all the legal support they need.  PJI's strategy is to coordinate and oversee large numbers of concurrent court actions through a network of over 1,000 attorneys nationwide.  And, according to former US Attorney General Edwin Meese, "The Institute fills a critical need for those whose civil liberties are threatened."  


Donate Now


Logo from Web


Brad Dacus President, Pacific Justice Institute
attorney blog
"I hope you will take this opportunity to join us as we continue in the fight for faith and freedom. 


Join Our Mailing List


  TEXT  " PJI " to the phone number 20222 to donate $10 now!


Brad Dacus
Pacific Justice Institute


Natural Marriage

The Ostrich Manifesto


The core case against gay marriage is extremely simple:  If a mother's missing, that's important; if a father's missing, that's also important.  We should think of it this way:  When you were growing up, didn't you notice the psychological difference between your mother and your father?  Wasn’t some of the difference obviously attributable to the fact that one was a man and the other a woman?  There has been an ideology, a kind of religion since the Seventies that says that psychological differences between the genders were mere social constructs, but the advent of brain scanning devices and new research in social psychology are now shifting the balance back to show that nature shapes us to some extent after all.  All this has enormous significance in the area of child-rearing, which is far-and-away the most important reason why society should keep committing itself to giving economic benefits and social recognition to mother-and-father couples.

Social Psychology.  Studies in social psychology confirm the common observation that women tend to describe themselves more in relational terms, welcome more help, experience more relationship-linked emotions, and are more attuned to others' relationships (Addis & Mahalik, 2003; Gabriel & Gardner; 1999; Tamres & others, 2002; Watkins & others, 1998, 2003). In conversation, men more often focus on tasks & connections with large groups, women on personal relationships (Tannen, 1990).  When on the phone, women's conversations with friends last longer (Smorda & Licoppe, 2000).  When on the computer, women spend more time sending emails in which they express more emotion (Crabtree, 2002; Thomson & Murachver, 2001). When in groups, women share more of their lives and offer more support (Dindia & Allen, 1992; Eagly, 1987.  When facing stress, men tend to respond with fight-or-flight; often, their response to a threat is combat.  In nearly all studies, notes Shelley Taylor (2002), women who are under stress more often “tend and befriend”; they turn to friends and family for support.  With children, women tend to coddle, men to challenge.

Neuroscience.  Imaging technology permits us to examine the brain without opening the skull. Behavioral differences between the sexes are the result of compelling forces set in motion before birth. For a woman, emotional structures in the female are larger than the male, while a male has about 20 times more testosterone than the female. So we're talking about hormonal influences and brain structure. All of these play important roles that make male-female relationships radically different than same-sex relationships.  It's wired right into the chemistry of the brain.  Progesterone, prolactin, and estrogen skyrocket during pregnancy, making a woman specially equipped to care for an infant, with the progesterone level going 40 times what is normal.  What has to be recovered is a rational and balanced sense of what men contribute and what women contribute.  The idea that men and women are psychologically interchangeable is being increasingly undermined by these findings. (Research by Dr. Louann Brizendine and many others)

Social Science.  Children lacking the distinctive love and authority of a father provide further evidence: Youth suicides   (US Dept. Of Health/Census)-5 times the average; homeless and runaway children  -32 times the average; children who show behavior disorders  -20 times the average (Center for Disease Control); high school dropouts  -9 times the average. (National Principals Association Report); youths in state-operated institutions -9 times the average. (U.S. Dept. of Justice, Sept. 1988); youths in prison -20 times the average. (Fulton Co. Georgia, Texas Dept. of Correction).

Back to the Real Basics.  Marriage is not about endorsing an attachment between adults. It is about creating the conditions in which children can come into the world fully protected and with a fair chance of being loved.  Marriage is, above all else, a system of privileges bestowed on a man and a women because it's in the interest of society to have the maximum number of its members be raised with both a masculine and a feminine parental influence from the psychological standpoint.  No matter how well-intentioned a same-sex parent might be, the valuable, gender-specific contributions of either a father or a mother are missing.  Men and women are not interchangeable. 

The time has come to celebrate the psychological distinctives of men and of women and to stop denigrating either men or women by discounting or diminishing these.   Either the relevant and constructive aspects of brain structure and hormones exist or they don’t.  There is no middle ground.  Common experience, common observation, and common sense provide all the rationale needed for refusing the special support of marriage to any sexual relationships that are alternatives to male-female marriage.  The studies merely confirm the self-evident. To dismiss these as they pertain to child-raising is to play the ostrich and to be on the wrong side of history.  The stability of civilization depends on restabilizing sexual and family life.

n   Public Domain